Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Siege: Secret Warriors

I cannot find a better picture, so you people may have to squint to see that one.

This book follows two different stories. One is Captaina nd America and Nick Fury catching up with each other, sinc ethey have not had a team up since Cap's death. The other story is more important. Ever since Siege 2, i'm sure i'm not the only person to have wondered how Alex, Phobos, God of Fear, Son of Ares, God of War, would react to The Sentry ripping him in two. Now, we get that reaction.

I was thrown for a loop when the kid decided to go after the President. The story reason is not so bad. Osborn would not have been in power if the President had not given it to him. So going after the President as the real man who is responsable for the madness in the Marvel world is not that far fetched. However, I don't quite agree with that reasoning. Alex is a child, so don't get me wrong, this is a child's way of lashing out at a situation he had no control over. In the story, though, Ares is as responsable for his death as the President, Norman Osborn, or The Sentry are. All 4 men could be held accountable for this particular death. This leads me to think Hickman is trying to draw attention to the Iraq War, a war started through the office of the Presidency.

I absolutely love the letter Phobos writes to the President at the end of this book. My favorite lines being "You sacrificed honor for expediency. You traded intent for quick action. You were wrong...and we all suffered for it. So, do better now, mortal man...for if not I, then surely some god somewhere will some day find you wanting."

If Jonathan Hickman is indeed echoing the war in Iraq with those lines, then he essentially called W. out, because, surely, W.'s Christian God may find him wanting for starting such a war. But that assumes Hickman believes the War in Iraq to be started for the sake of expediency and quick action, rather than to protect our country's honor or for a true intent.

Monday, May 3, 2010

Captain America 605

"Two Americas" comes to an end. American cnservatives have not been fully eviscerated. All the gnashing of teeth is pretty moot. Lets not beat around the bush, though. Brubaker took conservative anger at our government and used it to tell a story whose villains are examples of extreme conservative ideology. To be petty, Captain America arose out of anger at a form of extreme conservative idology, Nazism.
By the third act the arc has veered off of the the path of conservative anger at the current government and shifted to the culture wars. The real moral of this story is that, given we live in such a diverse country, we, sometimes, have to compromise some of our principals in order for us to interact with our fellow man. As long as people can exist and do not cause physical or devastating financial harm to each other, then you may have to give up the dream of homogeny. To tell that story necessitates a villain that may have a bit of a conservative lean to him. The culture wars are a conservative rallying point. The 1950s Captain America is a culture warrior taken to an illogical extreme. That comes into its sharpest focus when, atop the Hoover Dam, 1950s Cap begins screaming, "I don't want to look at this world and think it's right!" shortly before he attempts to blow it up.

I'm fine with Ed Brubaker using Captain America as a soap box for his ideals. It would not be a Cap comic without him fighting for something the writer views as an American concept. When Bill Willingham gets ahold of this comic, I won't begrudge him giving us stories with Flag Smasher on them. We live in a country, today, where audiences don't want to be given unbiased news reporting. Audiences actively seek out news that fits into their own world view or form opinions based on what they read out of the rare source of unbiased news. That is perfectly fine. Its how news has to survive, now. If people feel you do not accuratey report the news, they will find someone who they believe will, and that tends to be someone who presents news with a slant that they agree with. People like being informed, but also like being advised, and they respond to advice given by people they agree with.
If conservatives want a Captain America of their own, they are more than welcome to read Mark Millar's Cap in Ultimate Comics.

Friday, April 30, 2010

Mighty Avengers 36

Its not a surprise when I say I am in the tank for Dan Slott. His run on Mighty Avengers has been more enjoyable than Pak and Van Lente's Hercules. Additionally, he more understadably communicates more information between panels than Grant Morrison does. A lot of that second point comes from the incredible artwork of Khoi Pham, but Dan's writing, or absence of certain scenes in this case, shows how you can create good comics that rest on high points and avoiding writing about trivial details that don't advance the story in a meaningful way, or provide understanding of the story as a whole.
Between pages 7-8 Ultron reveals what he has done to corrupt Jan in the underspace, and rather than have 2-3 pages devoted to him enacting this plan, we get a suspenseful scene as he reveals what he has done and Slott/Pham place this revelation beautifully on the last panel of a page you have to turn in order to continue the story.
This is one of about 3 examples I can cite in this book of how Dan cuts out needless information and moves us along to the next high point in the story, and does it in a way the reader can follow.
I could continue to go on and on about this man, but, I dont think I have to. If you want fun comics that move at a breakneck pace and bring the most action/plot to you as can be fit in a 22 page comic, Dan Slott is that writer.

So now lets briefly mention Khoi Pham and this setting. Given that half the book takes place on Jan in Underspace, Pham has to utilize white space to its fullest. It is a background that, I believe, is meant for defining shots and heightens their meaningfulness. White space around a character means that your attention has to go on that object. Your eyes cannot wander and if the artwork/posing/fighting is not up to snuff, white space can be a detriment to the enjoyment of the comic. Pham uses white space so effectively in this book with the most awesome scene being the one on the 12th story page with Hank Pym launching off the tower of Jocastas at Ultron, who is floating in white space above Janet Van Dyne's body/universe. The Panel placement was superb, and the whitespace really forces you to focus on Pym due to the character's size and the contrast of Red and Yellow against white.

Just a great book all around and my favorite of the week.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Amazing Spider-Man 629


Well. That audio review thing blew right up in my face. And my procrastination, too.

Not a bad way to cap off this story. I'm a little bit hesitant to completely suspend my disbelief in the way this book asks me. I tend to shy away from a series of fateful coincidences that this book ended up becoming. That said, it is a fine story detailing, and continuing, the ongoing redemption of the Juggernaut in the Marvel U, which I wholeheartedly endorse under the auspice that the character is actually growing and evolving in a medium which embraces stagnation. Not to say that is a bad thing. Its just an observation. I wholeheartedly endorse this change just because of the fact it is change and it has honestly been one of the better things that came out of Chuck Austen's Uncanny X-Men run, and most enduring (looking in the direction of my run of "The Draco")

Meanwhile, in the backup story, we get a preview of the return of the Lizard! Well, I'm excited for it.

Friday, April 9, 2010

S.H.I.E.L.D. 1



So, hickman messes with Continuity and does a MASSIVE retcon of the Marvel U in this book. However, that is fine considering no one has bothered to really do much with ancient Marvel history outside of the FF, Dr. Doom, and Apocalypse. Really, Hickman is just tapping into an unmined vein of opportunity. Considering the technology that exists in the current Marvel World, why can't we accept that Leonardo DaVinci is the Reed Richards/Tony Stark of the 15th century?


Anyway, Hickman wallows in continuity in this book, but you dont have to be aware of continuity to enjoy this piece. I liked the special guest appearance of Apocalypse and Moon Knight in the ancient Egypt scene, and that was some nice similarities between Imhotep and Captain America.

There is a lot of Cosmic imagery in the book, Night/Day dichotamy, and Heliocentrism. All of it is not explained thoroughly in the first issue, but Hickman has set up a fabulous spread for our visual palettes to enjoy. Dustin Weaver really turns in gorgeous art-work on this book

It would not surprise me if the events and history told in this book begin having an impact on Hickman's other works in Secret Warriors and Fantastic Four. I'd dare say he is carving out a little niche of the universe for himself to play in. There's more that could be shared between this book and Secret Warriors rather than Fantastic Four, given the fact Nick Fury of S.H.I.E.L.D. is featured in Secret Warriors, but I would not be surprised if Hickman takes some of what he has in this book and runs with it in the Fantastic Four. Reed Richards and company have already traveled in time to Ancient Egypt and Doom is not too above using time travel for his own ends, so the events alluded to in this book may be better fleshed out in future FF books. One thing is for certain, though. This book may get me to buy into FF if this is a supposition that pans out to be true.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Spider-Man: Fever 1

Recently I've taken to reading "Essential Doctor Strange Volume 1" and this book compares favorably to those Stan Lee/Steve Ditko comics. Brendan McCarthy's artwork is pleasantly surreal when featuring Doctor Strange.
I was a bit unsure about the plot. As far as I am concerned, the Arachnix were an entirely new entity being introduced into the Marvel world. I tend to not embrace limited stories that don't feature villains I care about, or, rather, I need really good writing to truly keep my interest given my lack of familiarity with the antagonists. I hate mysteries because of that belief.
Right, back to the book. McCarthy does the proper thing in characterizing the Arachnix through the use of curious language at seemingly bizarre moments. Aside from the chanting of "Harrah Harrah" the little droppings of phrases such as "I shall have it with custard" and "It will be such a strange meat" are just sliiiiiightly off base of normalcy in their use. That helps evoke a more alien feeling towards the Arachnix rather than their looks, to me.
On the whole, the book is good. It is a solid beginning to a limited series, and I always welcome more stories featuring Doctor Strange.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Punisher 15



I'm not going to rehash anything about whether or not Frankencastle is supposed to be a good or bad, or whatever. Rick Remender is doing things with this character that no one could have expected that they would want to see in a Punisher book. That's the only thing that needs to be said about that.

Now, onto the content of the book itself. Once Remender is able to cut loose with the premise of the book, the amount of wacky that permeates every page of this comic is something to behold. There's Frank Castle riding a D&D Red Dragon. There's Frank shooting up WWII Nazi and Russian zombies. There's Hellsgaard. Everything you need to make this enjoyable is in here.

Regarding Hellsgaard: I read about how this villain is another example of what would happen if there are two Punishers in the world and they meet each other. Ennis covered that, I believe, and probably better. Hellsgaard is nothing like the Punisher in terms of motivation. Hellsgaard did lose his family to monsters and has vowed to kill all monsters. And if, in that last sentence, you replace "Hellsgaard" with "Frank Castle" and replace all the letters "n" with "b" you will have the summary of the Punisher. You know what though? They aren't the same guy. Hellsgaard is more akin to a racist than anything else, and Fraction covered that in War Journal, while Punisher is a killer of people for their deeds. Not the same. Do both men hate? Absolutely. But then that'd mean Wolverine is similar to the Punisher, too, and Magneto, as well.